<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Write.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.write.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.write.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:35:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do Not Go Back to the Future by Christine DePoister</title>
		<link>http://www.write.com/2011/07/30/do-not-go-back-to-the-future/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine DePoister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwestrequest.juggle-content.com/?p=49#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Oops! You are correct! {shame} :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! You are correct! {shame} <img src='http://www.write.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Keep The Focus The Same: Maintaining Grammatical Person by Rhi</title>
		<link>http://www.write.com/2011/08/03/keep-the-focus-the-same-maintaining-grammatical-person/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 04:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwestrequest.juggle-content.com/?p=269#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Well said. I know these rules front and backwards - I am sure I still do this sometimes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. I know these rules front and backwards &#8211; I am sure I still do this sometimes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do Not Go Back to the Future by Brenda A.</title>
		<link>http://www.write.com/2011/07/30/do-not-go-back-to-the-future/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 22:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwestrequest.juggle-content.com/?p=49#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Best – “This fishbowl is both beautiful and elegant, and is a wonderful home for your beloved fish.” A comma isn&#039;t required there.

This fishbowl is beautiful, elegant and a wonderful home for your beloved fish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best – “This fishbowl is both beautiful and elegant, and is a wonderful home for your beloved fish.” A comma isn&#8217;t required there.</p>
<p>This fishbowl is beautiful, elegant and a wonderful home for your beloved fish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Not-So-Comical Comma by Rhi</title>
		<link>http://www.write.com/2011/07/16/the-not-so-comical-comma/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 07:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwestrequest.juggle-content.com/?p=40#comment-69</guid>
		<description>@tutor: very true. However, the article does say, &quot;when used with conjunctions....&quot; which makes it accurate. yes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tutor: very true. However, the article does say, &#8220;when used with conjunctions&#8230;.&#8221; which makes it accurate. yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Walking the Fine Line Between Such As and Like by Abby</title>
		<link>http://www.write.com/2011/07/04/walking-the-fine-line-between-such-as-and-like/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Abby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 01:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwestrequest.juggle-content.com/?p=33#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Good article. You clarifed some things for me. I do not like &quot;such as&quot; because it seems out of place, and I tend to stick with &quot;like&quot; or &quot;that include.&quot; You did make the use of &quot;such as&quot; very clear - thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article. You clarifed some things for me. I do not like &#8220;such as&#8221; because it seems out of place, and I tend to stick with &#8220;like&#8221; or &#8220;that include.&#8221; You did make the use of &#8220;such as&#8221; very clear &#8211; thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Not-So-Comical Comma by Brenda A.</title>
		<link>http://www.write.com/2011/07/16/the-not-so-comical-comma/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwestrequest.juggle-content.com/?p=40#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Good point. The &quot;When combined with conjunctions&quot; part is pretty important. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. The &#8220;When combined with conjunctions&#8221; part is pretty important. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Not-So-Comical Comma by Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.write.com/2011/07/16/the-not-so-comical-comma/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 03:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwestrequest.juggle-content.com/?p=40#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t use the Oxford comma when writing for Midwest, but otherwise I always use it. Omitting it can sometimes cause confusion, while including it does not. The Oxford comma is a thing of beauty. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t use the Oxford comma when writing for Midwest, but otherwise I always use it. Omitting it can sometimes cause confusion, while including it does not. The Oxford comma is a thing of beauty. <img src='http://www.write.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Not-So-Comical Comma by Rhi</title>
		<link>http://www.write.com/2011/07/16/the-not-so-comical-comma/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwestrequest.juggle-content.com/?p=40#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Jerry, your point is a good one. The ultimate comma rule is to use it to communicate, not clutter. So, if it is necessary for clarity--use it. In your example it may be useful. However, most of the time it is redundant since the conjunction communicates the last item in the list is to come... Would you agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry, your point is a good one. The ultimate comma rule is to use it to communicate, not clutter. So, if it is necessary for clarity&#8211;use it. In your example it may be useful. However, most of the time it is redundant since the conjunction communicates the last item in the list is to come&#8230; Would you agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Not-So-Comical Comma by Tutor</title>
		<link>http://www.write.com/2011/07/16/the-not-so-comical-comma/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Tutor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 04:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwestrequest.juggle-content.com/?p=40#comment-65</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;ve offered some misleading advice: &quot;Commas are used to separate two independent clauses, meaning that if the two parts can stand alone as complete sentences, then a comma must be used.&quot;

Commas may only separate independent clauses when one of the following conjunctions is present: and, but, for, or, nor, so, yet. If commas are used without one of these conjunctions, the result would be a run-on sentence. A semicolon is the correct choice for linking independent clauses. 

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/607/04/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ve offered some misleading advice: &#8220;Commas are used to separate two independent clauses, meaning that if the two parts can stand alone as complete sentences, then a comma must be used.&#8221;</p>
<p>Commas may only separate independent clauses when one of the following conjunctions is present: and, but, for, or, nor, so, yet. If commas are used without one of these conjunctions, the result would be a run-on sentence. A semicolon is the correct choice for linking independent clauses. </p>
<p><a href="http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/607/04/" rel="nofollow">http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/607/04/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Not-So-Comical Comma by Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.write.com/2011/07/16/the-not-so-comical-comma/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwestrequest.juggle-content.com/?p=40#comment-64</guid>
		<description>The Oxford comma is both useful and correct.  I am trying to choose between pancakes, french toast, steak and eggs for breakfast.  Wait, is steak and eggs one thing or two?  If only your style guide normally used the Oxford comma, I would know that steak and eggs was a single dish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Oxford comma is both useful and correct.  I am trying to choose between pancakes, french toast, steak and eggs for breakfast.  Wait, is steak and eggs one thing or two?  If only your style guide normally used the Oxford comma, I would know that steak and eggs was a single dish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

